Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Stage 1 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

Meets

Erik Nordmark, Joe Pearson

The typical IP Policy for Projects under the LF Edge Foundation is Apache 2.0 for Code Contributions, Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) for new inbound contributions, and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for Documentation. Projects under outside licenses may still submit for consideration, subject to review/approval of the TAC and Board.

Meets

Using Apache 2.0, DCO, CCA4.0 - Technical Charter

Upon acceptance, At Large projects must list their status prominently on website/readme

Meets

https://www.lfedge.org/projects/eve/


Stage 1 Projects, please skip to Additional Information Requested from All Projects

...

Stage 2 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Development of a growth plan (to include both roadmap of projected feature sets as well as overall community growth/project maturity), to be done in conjunction with their project mentor(s) at the TAC.

Meets

Feature Roadmap

Community TBD

Process documents for TSC and committer expansion are now in place. Will expand on those.

Document that it is being used in POCs.

Meets

Project EVE has been used in various POCs and is in production use. Some production users have made it public that they are using Project EVE  as can be seen in https://zededa.com/resources/case-studies/ (Switch Automation, PV Hardware, BOBST, PeopleFlow) while others have presented at https://zededa.com/transform/  (VMware, Emerson, Rockwell Automation, SLB)

In addition there is production use by a top-3 automobile manufacturer at car dealers.

TBD References?

Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions.

Meets

Over the last year we have had 907 Commits from 28 Contributors to 6 Repositories
LFX Insights-EVE CommitsSee insights below

Demonstrate that the current level of community participation is sufficient to meet the goals outlined in the growth plan.

MeetsThe above level of commits are likely to continue as we continue deliver the items on the roadmap and grow the TSC and committers.

Demonstrate evidence of, or a plan for, interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).

Meets

Done work with Project Alvarium (see webcast below)

Continued work with Fledge 

TBD list of interop


Stage 2 Projects, please skip to Additional Information Requested from All Projects

...

TBDTBD

Criteria

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Have a defined governing body of at least 5 or more members (owners and core maintainers), of which no more than 1/3 is affiliated with the same employer. In the case there are 5 governing members, 2 may be from the same employer.

TBD

TSC is currently at 3 members across 3 companies

Have a documented and publicly accessible description of the project's governance, decision-making, and release processes.

Release process TBD

TBD GOVERNANCE.md? vs. CONTRIBUTOR?TSC and committer election process, https://github.com/lf-edge/eve/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

Have a healthy number of committers from at least two organizations. A committer is defined as someone with the commit bit; i.e., someone who can accept contributions to some or all of the project.

TBD

Currently the three TSC members

https://github.com/lf-edge/eve/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md

Demonstrate evidence of interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).

Meets

See above evidence under stage 2

Adopt the Foundation Code of Conduct.

Meets


Explicitly define a project governance and committer process. This is preferably laid out in a GOVERNANCE.md file and references a CONTRIBUTING.md and OWNERS.md file showing the current and emeritus committers.

Meets; different file names

TSC and committer election process, https://github.com/lf-edge/eve/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md https://github.com/lf-edge/eve/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md


Have a public list of project adopters for at least the primary repo (e.g., ADOPTERS.md or logos on the project website).

TBD


...

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Intention for the upcoming year (Remain at current stage OR advance towards the next Stage)

Advance to stage 3

Include a link to your project’s LFX Insights page. We will be looking for signs of consistent or increasing contribution activity. Please feel free to add commentary to add color to the numbers and graphs we will see on Insights.

https://insights-v2.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/project-eve/trends

Shows stready increase of contributors

How many maintainers do you have, and which organizations are they from? (Feel free to link to an existing MAINTAINERS file if appropriate.)

TBD

Currently the TSC (Three people from three different organizations)

What do you know about adoption, and how has this changed since your last review / since you joined the current Stage? If you can list companies that are end users of your project, please do so. (Feel free to link to an existing ADOPTERS file if appropriate.)Added VMware, Emerson, and Rockwell Automation.

Added a top-3 automobile manufacturer.

TBD

How has the project performed against its goals since the last review? (We won't penalize you if your goals changed for good reasons.)TBD)

The goals for 2022 were

  1. Deliver on the  Feature Roadmap (done)
  2. Continue growing the ecosystem of qualified hardware and edge applications running on EVE (partial)
  3. Continue growing the number of project maintainers (needed process/criteria clarification)
  4. Graduate to Stage 3 (deferred)
What are the current goals of the project? For example, are you working on major new features? Or are you concentrating on adoption or documentation?

Goals for 2023

  1. Deliver on the  Feature Roadmap, including
Large
  1. technical investigations are in the area of storage/compute clustering, and additional networking functionality,
  2. Expand the TSC and committers
  3. Graduate to Stage 3
How can LF Edge help you achieve your upcoming goals?TBD
Do you think that your project meets the criteria for the next Stage?Has started the overdue process of updating the TSC and comitters based on recently documented processSee above
Please summarize Outreach Activities in which the Project has participated in (e.g. Participation in conferences, seminars, speaking engagements, meetups, etc.)TBD

ONE Summit 2022

webcast: How LF Edge projects track CO2 footprint with secure monitoring at the Edge

EVE-OS and security featured on https://techfieldday.com/appearance/zededa-presents-at-edge-field-day-1/


Are you leveraging the Technical Project Getting Started Checklist? If yes, please provide link (if publicly available).No, started before that checklist existed.

Please review, and update if needed, your Project entry on the Existing Project Taxonomy page, modifying the Last Updated / Reviewed date in the header.

Updated

Please share a LFX security report for your project in the last 30 days

https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/a092M00001IV4DuQAL/overview

https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/a092M00001IV4DuQAL/vulnerabilities

Hard to understand data; matching something else since no dpkg in build or output but 

https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-1664

Note potential confusion/overlap due to shared lf-edge GH organization; see https://projectadmin.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/project/a092M00001IV4DuQAL/tools/security/overview


...