Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Presented on TAC Weekly Call:  YYYY/MM/DD (Meeting Recording)

...


Info

** THIS PAGE IS IN PROGRESS **

Below is a self-assessment submitted by TSC Chair/Maintainers of the Project. Comments/questions/feedback is welcome either a) in the Comments at the bottom of the page or b) during the TAC call when information is presented

...

Stage 1 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

Meets

Trevor Conn

Erik Nordmark

Jim St. Leger

The typical IP Policy for Projects under the LF Edge Foundation is Apache 2.0 for Code Contributions, Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) for new inbound contributions, and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for Documentation. Projects under outside licenses may still submit for consideration, subject to review/approval of the TAC and Board.

Meets

Apache 2.0 

Upon acceptance, At Large projects must list their status prominently on website/readme

Meets

https://www.lfedge.org/projects/alvarium/

Meeting History (TSC)

...


Additional Information Requested from All Projects

...

Stage 2: Growth Stage

Stage 3 Projects also requested to complete this section

...

Stage 2 Criteria (from the PLD)

...

...

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

...

Development of a growth plan (to include both roadmap of projected feature sets as well as overall community growth/project maturity), to be done in conjunction with their project mentor(s) at the TAC.

...

Meets

...

TBD

...

Document that it is being used in POCs.

...

Meets

...

Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions.

...

Meets

...

TBD

...

Demonstrate that the current level of community participation is sufficient to meet the goals outlined in the growth plan.

...

TBD

...

Demonstrate that the current level of community participation is sufficient to meet the goals outlined in the growth plan.

...

TBD

...

Demonstrate evidence of, or a plan for, interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).

...

Stage 2 Projects, please skip to Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Intention for the upcoming year (Remain at current stage OR advance towards the next Stage)

Remain at current stage

Include a link to your project’s LFX Insights page. We will be looking for signs of consistent or increasing contribution activity. Please feel free to add commentary to add color to the numbers and graphs we will see on Insights.

TBD

How many maintainers do you have, and which organizations are they from? (Feel free to link to an existing MAINTAINERS file if appropriate.)

TBD5, all from Dell.

We are expecting contributions from IOTA (Rust SDK) in the near future based on recent adoption described below.
What do you know about adoption, and how has this changed since your last review / since you joined the current Stage? If you can list companies that are end users of your project, please do so. (Feel free to link to an existing ADOPTERS file if appropriate.)

One project adopter so far. 

  • Canada-Chile Reciclo Orgánicos Program, 2017 – 2021 – Alvarium onboarded into Molina Anaerobic Biodigester facility assigning higher confidence to carbon capture data generated from automation than manual sources.
TBD
How has the project performed against its goals since the last review? (We won't penalize you if your goals changed for good reasons.)
  • We satisfied the goal of porting the original Go SDK to other languages (Java and Python)
  • We satisfied the goal of providing an end-to-end implementation for score calculation so that interested parties can see the full solution
  • The above was demonstrated at ONES 2021
  • We did not, however, meet our goals for adoption or engagement across different partners/verticals
TBD
What are the current goals of the project? For example, are you working on major new features? Or are you concentrating on adoption or documentation?TBD

In the coming year, our focus is on growing adoption and partner engagement. 

We recognized at the start of the project that our implementation and approach has been very specific to requirements within Dell. We wanted partners to help us evolve toward something that might be more flexible and applicable to use cases beyond IOT.

How can LF Edge help you achieve your upcoming goals?TBD
Do you think that your project meets the criteria for the next Stage?TBDNo
Please summarize Outreach Activities in which the Project has participated in (e.g. Participation in conferences, seminars, speaking engagements, meetups, etc.)
  • Open Source Summit 2022 – Mat Yarger (IOTA) represented the project at LF-Edge Workshop
  • ONES LATAM 2022: Presentation by Kathy Giori (Zededa)
TBD
Are you leveraging the Technical Project Getting Started Checklist? If yes, please provide link (if publicly available).TBDNo

Please review, and update if needed, your Project entry on the Existing Project Taxonomy page, modifying the Last Updated / Reviewed date in the header.

TBD


Please share a LFX security report for your project in the last 30 days

TBD
https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/a092M00001IkOXAQA3/overview