Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Stage 2 and Stage 3 Projects also requested to complete this section, as PLD acceptance criteria requires meeting current as well as prior stage requirements

Stage 1 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

Meets

Henry Lau (HP), Joe Pearson (IBM), Trevor Conn (Dell), Leding Li (Baidu), and Peter Moonki (Samsung)

The typical IP Policy for Projects under the LF Edge Foundation is Apache 2.0 for Code Contributions, Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) for new inbound contributions, and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for Documentation. Projects under outside licenses may still submit for consideration, subject to review/approval of the TAC and Board.

Meets

EdgeX is an Apache 2.0 license project.  We require all contributions comply with this license agreement as stated in our Wiki below.
https://wiki.edgexfoundry.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=21823866
EdgeX policy to review new libs, modules, etc. brought into the project to insure anything we use (or is used indirectly by modules we bring in) is compliant with this license. https://wiki.edgexfoundry.org/display/FA/Vetting+Process+for+3rd+Party+Dependencies
We also conduct code scans regularly (with each PR) for any license compliance issues.

Upon acceptance, At Large projects must list their status prominently on website/readme

Meets

Displayed proudly on the EdgeX wiki home page:

Image Modified
https://wiki.edgexfoundry.org/display/FA/EdgeX+Foundry+Project+Wiki

Also on our website: 

Image Modified

https://www.edgexfoundry.org/


Stage 1 Projects, please skip to Additional Information Requested from All Projects

...

Stage 3 Projects also requested to complete this section

Stage 2 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Development of a growth plan (to include both roadmap of projected feature sets as well as overall community growth/project maturity), to be done in conjunction with their project mentor(s) at the TAC.

Meets

We maintain a roadmap for the next 2 years and have a long term backlog that extends beyond that timeframe.  The next couple of releases are documented with pages in our Wiki (and you can see past release roadmaps) here:  https://wiki.edgexfoundry.org/display/FA/Roadmap.
Minor fixes and enhancements are also captured in issues with each repository in Github.  Github tags are used to label bugs from enhancement requests and when appropriate are associated with a specific target release (e.g., "Levski" tags on the Core Working Group project board here: https://github.com/orgs/edgexfoundry/projects/25 for an example).

Document that it is being used in POCs.

Meets

EdgeX is used in countless POCs worldwide.  This list is more about production uses.

  • Companies announced use of EdgeX in their products include Accenture (AIP+ product), ThunderSoft (TurboX), Jaingxing Intelligence (EdgeBox), and Tibco (Project Air), HP (Engage Edge), Advantech, UST Global.
   

Demonstrate a substantial ongoing flow of commits and merged contributions.

Meets

Collected from LF Insights for the project since inception and for the last 1 year


TotalThis Past Year
Contributors616197
Pull requests

Reviewers


Demonstrate that the current level of community participation is sufficient to meet the goals outlined in the growth plan.

Meets

10 successful project releases since April 2017 (2 each year)

  • EdgeX 2.1 (Jakarta) was our first Long Term Support (LTS) version, released on Nov 17th 2021
  • EdgeX 2.2 (Kamakura) also released on May 11th, 2022

On track for two more releases in the next year:  2.3 (code named Levski) in fall of 2022, and a likely 3.0 release in the spring of 2023 (code named Minnsota).

Demonstrate evidence of, or a plan for, interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).

Meets

With regard to convergence with Fledge, both organizations have provided connectors to each other's system (for importing/exporting data) but no further discussions have taken place around additional convergence or interoperability


Stage 2 Projects, please skip to Additional Information Requested from All Projects

...

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Intention for the upcoming year (Remain at current stage OR advance towards the next Stage)

Remain Impact Project

Include a link to your project’s LFX Insights page. We will be looking for signs of consistent or increasing contribution activity. Please feel free to add commentary to add color to the numbers and graphs we will see on Insights.

https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/projects/lfedge%2Fedgex-foundry/dashboard;quicktime=time_filter_3Y

How many maintainers do you have, and which organizations are they from? (Feel free to link to an existing MAINTAINERS file if appropriate.)

https://wiki.edgexfoundry.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=21823860
WG Chair are maintainers of their respective repositories with additional rights to nominate others (which often happens).  Therefore we have at least 9 maintainers.  Most WG Chairs nominate several maintainers to help with the workload of the incoming code reviews.  For example, the main service repository has 17 maintainers/committers (see https://github.com/orgs/edgexfoundry/teams/edgex-go-committers/members).  A small effort/repository may only have a few maintainers.
What do you know about adoption, and how has this changed since your last review / since you joined the current Stage? If you can list companies that are end users of your project, please do so. (Feel free to link to an existing ADOPTERS file if appropriate.)

We are learning about new adopters all the time.   In addition to the companies that are participating in the construction of EdgeX, the following companies have announced (and presented) on EdgeX adoption:

Canonical, IOTech, HP, Thundersoft, Jiangxing Intelligence, Tibco and Accenture

Organizations like Eaton and Schneider Electric are adopting EdgeX, with Eaton now moving further having joined the TSC.

How has the project performed against its goals since the last review? (We won't penalize you if your goals changed for good reasons.)Met or exceeded goals.  Over 10 million container downloads. Regular releases for 5+ years, including the first Long Term Support (LTS) made this year, indicating stability to the marketplace
What are the current goals of the project? For example, are you working on major new features? Or are you concentrating on adoption or documentation?

Working on a minor release targeted for fall 2022 with a likely major release for spring of 2023.

Looking to continue to grow the user base with more publicly referenced adopters.

How can LF Edge help you achieve your upcoming goals?

Slack archive and creation of new user or adopter FAQs from specific tagged Slack messages.  Community has decided not to adopt LFX Chat (preference to stay with Slack), but still need to work around the 10K limit and turning knowledge into searchable/query-able user help long term.

Join with other organizations looking to improve dev advocacy through hackathons, badging, and other programs.

Do you think that your project meets the criteria for the next Stage?We are at stage 3
Please summarize Outreach Activities in which the Project has participated in (e.g. Participation in conferences, seminars, speaking engagements, meetups, etc.)

Prior to COVID, regular participation at Hannover Messe, IOT SWC, IOT World and LF events.  Our members have spoken frequently at live events all over the world.

Restrictions mean that virtual events are more commonplace but events appear to be restarting with an aim to visit live events again in 2023.

China continue to enjoy excellent EdgeX participation events with 64 proposals received for the China EdgeX Challenge 2022. The Challenge completes throughout October and November 2023. There is an EdgeX Meetup in China planned for Q4 (Nov/Dec)

Are you leveraging the Technical Project Getting Started Checklist? If yes, please provide link (if publicly available).This was developed after our project launched, but we already follow all steps.

Please review, and update if needed, your Project entry on the Existing Project Taxonomy page, modifying the Last Updated / Reviewed date in the header.


Please share a LFX security report for your project in the last 30 days