...
Criteria | Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable | Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples) |
---|---|---|
Have a defined governing body of at least 5 or more members (owners and core maintainers), of which no more than 1/3 is affiliated with the same employer. In the case there are 5 governing members, 2 may be from the same employer. | Needs Improvement | Link to TSC page on wiki. Current composition is:
I am concerned about over-representation by IBM, and thus want to ensure that the project will mature to reach a state where it could continue to thrive even without IBM's active participation. |
Have a documented and publicly accessible description of the project's governance, decision-making, and release processes. | Meets |
|
Have a healthy number of committers from at least two organizations. A committer is defined as someone with the commit bit; i.e., someone who can accept contributions to some or all of the project. | Meets | See Insights links above. NOTE: Current Insights organization report not accurate. |
Demonstrate evidence of interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects). | Meets | See interoperability section above. |
Adopt the Foundation Code of Conduct. | Meets | |
Have a public list of project adopters for at least the primary repo (e.g., ADOPTERS.md or logos on the project website). | Meets | Mainsail, Turnium, IBM, Intel, Samsung, DLR (Rhineland-Palatinate), AgriRegio Projekt, AccuKnox, mimik, Scale Computing, Boston Dynamics, Promare, Intensivate, expeer |
...