Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Criteria

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Have a defined governing body of at least 5 or more members (owners and core maintainers), of which no more than 1/3 is affiliated with the same employer. In the case there are 5 governing members, 2 may be from the same employer.

Needs Improvement

Link to TSC page on wiki.  Current composition is:

  • IBM - 5 (71%)
  • AccuKnox - 1  (14%)
  • mimik Technologies - 1 (14%)

I am concerned about over-representation by IBM, and thus want to ensure that the project will mature to reach a state where it could continue to thrive even without IBM's active participation.

Have a documented and publicly accessible description of the project's governance, decision-making, and release processes.

Explicitly define a project governance and committer process. This is preferably laid out in a GOVERNANCE.md file and references a CONTRIBUTING.md and OWNERS.md file showing the current and emeritus committers.

Meets

  • Governance - high level description of goals
  • Community - organizational structure, roles, process
  • Contributions - feature requests & lifecycle process
  • Release - feature releases & roadmap
    see Growth Plan above

Have a healthy number of committers from at least two organizations. A committer is defined as someone with the commit bit; i.e., someone who can accept contributions to some or all of the project.

Meets

See Insights links above.

NOTE: Current Insights organization report not accurate.

Demonstrate evidence of interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).

Meets

See interoperability section above.

Adopt the Foundation Code of Conduct.

Meets

Have a public list of project adopters for at least the primary repo (e.g., ADOPTERS.md or logos on the project website).

Meets

Mainsail, Turnium, IBM, Intel, Samsung, DLR (Rhineland-Palatinate), AgriRegio Projekt, AccuKnox, mimik, Scale Computing, Boston Dynamics, Promare, Intensivate, expeer

...