Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Criteria

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Have a defined governing body of at least 5 or more members (owners and core maintainers), of which no more than 1/3 is affiliated with the same employer. In the case there are 5 governing members, 2 may be from the same employer.


Link to TSC page on wiki.  Current composition is:

  • IBM - 5 (71%)
  • AccuKnox - 1  (14%)
  • mimik Technologies - 1 (14%)

Have a documented and publicly accessible description of the project's governance, decision-making, and release processes.


  • Governance - high level description of goals
  • Community - organizational structure, roles, process
  • Contributions - feature requests & lifecycle process
  • Release - feature releases & roadmap **TBD**

Have a healthy number of committers from at least two organizations. A committer is defined as someone with the commit bit; i.e., someone who can accept contributions to some or all of the project.



Demonstrate evidence of interoperability, compatibility or extension to other LF Edge Projects. Examples may include demonstrating modularity (ability to swap in components between projects).



Adopt the Foundation Code of Conduct.



Explicitly define a project governance and committer process. This is preferably laid out in a GOVERNANCE.md file and references a CONTRIBUTING.md and OWNERS.md file showing the current and emeritus committers.



Have a public list of project adopters for at least the primary repo (e.g., ADOPTERS.md or logos on the project website).


Mainsail, Turnium, IBM, Intel, Samsung, DLR (Rhineland-Palatinate), AgriRegio Projekt, AccuKnox, mimik, Scale Computing, Boston Dynamics, Promare,  Intensivate, expeer

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Intention for the upcoming year (Remain at current stage OR advance towards the next Stage)

We intend to advance to Stage Three when the project and our TAC Sponsors feel we're ready.  Hopefully we will be in that position 2H2023.

Include a link to your project’s LFX Insights page. We will be looking for signs of consistent or increasing contribution activity. Please feel free to add commentary to add color to the numbers and graphs we will see on Insights.

Insights Link

How many maintainers do you have, and which organizations are they from? (Feel free to link to an existing MAINTAINERS file if appropriate.)

We feature a MAINTAINERS file in each repo, ex: 

What do you know about adoption, and how has this changed since your last review / since you joined the current Stage? If you can list companies that are end users of your project, please do so. (Feel free to link to an existing ADOPTERS file if appropriate.)

The most recent adoptions are:

  • AccuKnox integrating KubeArmor with Open Horizon, modifying KubeArmor for bare Linux hosts to work with our Device Agent, and joining our project as Partner
  • IBM implementing our new features in their downstream IEAM 4.5.0 product and rolling out their internal video streaming infrastructure
  • Mainsail, Turnium, and IBM building Falcon Tactical Edge for a secure edge computing stack based on our project, Intel chips, and secure networking
  • IBM team currently building a Container on Wheels implementation for eventual open-source contribution to Eclipse SDV
  • Intensivate building lab to demo their RISC-V ISA SoC with ~100 units with application deployment managed by Open Horizon
  • DLR testing container deployments to Samsung industrial android devices using Open Horizon as demonstrated at MWC 2023
How has the project performed against its goals since the last review? (We won't penalize you if your goals changed for good reasons.)

Previous Goals:

  • Add non-IBM voting members to the TSC (at least 30%)
    See above.  Non-IBM TSC membership at 28%
  • Add 20 or more active volunteer contributors
  • Add three project partners contributing value
    We now have two official Partners and at least ten Adopters
  • Bring two new members to LF Edge
  • Create a project web site
    In progress, see dev sandbox
  • Mentor twelve new candidates
  • Establish ties with at least one university
    Rensselaer Polytechnic through RCOS
  • Publish the beta release of the Open Retail Reference Architecture
    Release v1 was completed.  Gearing up for v2
  • Launch the Open Edge Services Catalog
    Launched as the open-horizon-services GitHub
What are the current goals of the project? For example, are you working on major new features? Or are you concentrating on adoption or documentation?
How can LF Edge help you achieve your upcoming goals?
Do you think that your project meets the criteria for the next Stage?Not quite yet.  We need to diversify our TSC company representation.
Please summarize Outreach Activities in which the Project has participated in (e.g. Participation in conferences, seminars, speaking engagements, meetups, etc.)
Are you leveraging the Technical Project Getting Started Checklist? If yes, please provide link (if publicly available).

Please review, and update if needed, your Project entry on the Existing Project Taxonomy page, modifying the Last Updated / Reviewed date in the header.


Please share a LFX security report for your project in the last 30 days

SECURITY.md


...